>From Aaron Voisine <voisine at ByteMobile.com> >Hey guys. I haven't been around for a while, so if this has already been >discussed, I apologize. The major performance consideration with freenet >is network lag. I think it would be beneficial to integrate zlib >compression into the freenet protocols, just like in HTTP 1.1.
The FCP (client-node) protocol is only used locally, so latency shouldn't be an issue there. The FNP (node-node) protocol mostly sends already encrypted data, which will compress poorly or not at all... -- Benjamin Coates _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Thu Apr 26 10:39:40 2001 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id CAA14905 for <danello at danky.com>; Thu, 26 Apr 2001 02:00:27 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
