> 2) How would you rate your code for platform-independence and portability, > especially to platforms like Windoze?
I don't personally see what the big issue is with portability of C code to Windows... unless the Freenet-in-C node code does __exceptionally__ weird stuff won't it just compile fine with Cygwin? Anywho, how's Whiterose coming along? I'd personally prefer to run a node written as a Java-to-C++ port than a Java-to-C port. I know there's development effort ongoing to make a freenet node written in C++ for Microsoft Visual Studio [BTW - sorry Matt, i __still__ haven't had a chance to look at __any__ of that stuff, and my many attempts to build GMP as a dll failed at the last hurdle.. :( ] Do we need all these versions? Perhaps one in 'C++' and (at a pinch) one in 'C'. Oi Reckon. > I can anticipate that in time, Windows node installations will vastly > outnumber *nix ones (if they don't already). Dunno about that ... Windows isn't exactly the most stable OS. Unless by 'installation' you mean casual freenet node rather than 24/7 node? D ----- Original Message ----- From: "David McNab" <da...@rebirthing.co.nz> To: <devl at freenetproject.org> Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 3:59 AM Subject: Re: [freenet-devl] YAEFNIIC _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
