On Wednesday 14 February 2001 01:17, Mark wrote:
> On Tue, 13 Feb 2001, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> ...
> > On a more general note, the network seems like it is in a pretty feeble
> > state. I am having a hard time getting my pages to propagate. That's
> > despite the fact that I run code to request them from several servers
> > from inform.php to fake demand.
>
> Actually I can request every file in your MSK for yesterday except
> URI_test.html. 
But I cheat by requesting all my pages through multiple nodes from inform.php.
And also my content is pretty popular compared to other stuff in Freenet.

My worry is that your average user who is just using fproxy to insert a few 
files will never get their data established in the network and will just give 
up.

I re-ran my key validator on all the keys in Steve's key index yesterday.  
Only 95 out of 2340 were reachable at an htl of 30!

details:
I harvested 62 node addresses from inform.php and rotated through them while 
making the requests (i.e. so nodes never got concurrent or sequential
requests). I culled out nodes that failed with ConnectionExceptions and
retried the failed keys on other nodes. 

I originally planned to run a second pass to double check the failed keys but 
I stopped after the first pass fearing that I might damage the network.  I 
have noticed that if you make too many failed requests in a short period of 
time it seems to kill routing.

--gj

P.S.
Here's another MSK site from Steve's Key Index: freenet:BonsaiKitten1//
I didn't insert it.  It trips the security filter all over the place.
But it has lots of files.

-- 
Web page inside Freenet:
freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage//

_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to