> We don't ATM. We support replacement presentation layers, but there > is no structure in place, not even in the experimental 0.4 (which has > a much better architecture regarding that stuff in general) supports > several presentations at once (I considered it, but decided it was > not worth the bother atm).
I figured as such, which is why implementing a second presentation layer would be useful, so that the necessary infrastructure for multiple presentation layers will develop. I doubt that such infrastructure will develop without a second implemenation making it immediately necessary. However, I'm really much more interested in multiple transport layers than multiple presentation layers. They're much more immediately useful. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
