On Tue, Feb 27, 2001 at 01:16:10AM -0600, Steven Hazel wrote: > > Oh, forgot something - anyone got any thoughts on some form of > > authentication mechanism built into FCP, to support non-local but > > legal connections? I can guarantee that people will want this > > sooner or later so we may as-well make provision for it in the > > protocol now.
> The way to do this, if we want to do it, is to accept remote > connections via SSL, with ssh-style authentication. I don't like SSL much - but for this I can see the argument (thou tunneling thou ssh would be better - if somewhat non-standard). Again this is an external item. If someone wants to write a FCP forwarding proxy (accepting SSL and passing the data onto 127.0.0.1) - feel free. AGL -- Never underestimate the power of a small tactical nuclear weapon. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010227/705d9729/attachment.pgp>
