> "The Freenet network is not able to censor single files or certain > content out. All content is sent encrypted and I am with no means able > to identify or control the content which is being stored on my node. > Even though you were able to retrieve forbidden information via my > Freenet node, it does not mean I was in the possesion of these files > before *your* retrieval request put them there." (blah, blah, blah,...) > > You get the point, somebody similar to a lawer could have a short look > at it, and making it as bullet proof as it gets. What do you think of > it? > Sebastian
I think that this is a frighteningly important contribution to Freenet. Could someone confirm what the __legal__ situation is with Freenet in various countries - am I right in assuming that there is no standard law in _any_ country that can affect usage of Freenet? A boiler-plate reply text, backed up by a legal statement, would go a long way to achieve a primary aim of the project, namely to reassure users that their privacy goes hand-in-hand with the operation of the network, and that untraceability is a fundamental aspect of Freenet. IANAL Dave _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://www.uprizer.com/mailman/listinfo/devl
