On Monday 11 June 2001 13:12, Ian wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 11, 2001 at 11:49:14AM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote: > > Back in april, I suggested adding support for "checked jumps" to fproxy. > > Yep, this is a good idea, although why nescessitate that the page author > uses "CHECKED__JUMP" - why not just do it for all off-freenet hyperlinks > automatically Here are my reasons: 0) I thought that there was a consensus on this list that having fproxy dynamically modify html was a Very Bad Thing (tm) for several reasons. e.g. it pisses of content authors, there are unforseen security/anonimity implications. 1) Writing a real-time HTML parser that could handle such transformations in a robust, secure way is hard. Knowing that your implementation is correct is even harder...
The approach taken by the patch is really simple ( = robust and debuggable) even if it is not as elegant. Should I check it in? -- gj -- Web page inside Freenet: freenet:MSK at SSK@enI8YFo3gj8UVh-Au0HpKMftf6QQAgE/homepage// _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
