On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 12:54:37PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:15:52PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 16, 2001 at 07:57:58PM -0400, Tavin Cole wrote: > > > Fproxy should just support https instead of http. Browsers are pretty > > > good about warning you when a page tries to load something from a > > > different server or over a non-https protocol. > > > > While the unnescessary encryption-decryption is irritating, I tend to > > agree. > > We could at least wait until fproxy doesn't use an encrypted protocol to > speak to the node. > > Having this happen locally: > > Encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt-encrypt-decrypt > ssl ssl fnp fnp fnp fnp fnp fnp ssl ssl > browser fproxy fproxy node node node node fproxy fproxy > browser
Ok, that isn't quite true. There is actually ONE MORE decrypt or encrypt for the actual data... > seems a little silly (and people wonder why Freenet is slow...) > > -- > 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' > 'Here,' Montag touched his head. > 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. > > Oskar Sandberg > oskar at freenetproject.org > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
