Oskar Sandberg <oskar at freenetproject.org> wrote: > On Sun, Jun 17, 2001 at 05:12:33PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > 1) Is anyone presently re-writing for 0.4? If so, who? > > Not precisely. From the begining the goal has been to place the http > interface inside the node for 0.4, which I think everyone agrees is a > good thing, since currently fproxy and the node operate inside the same > JVM yet communicate via an AES encrypted TCP socket, which is a little > silly (see my earlier encrypt-decrypt post). > > Back in February I though I would get started on doing that, so I poked > around inside fproxy and ended up feeling a lot like (no disrespect to > Theo and Brandon) when I as a kid went poking around inside a box I had > burried a dead bird in a week earlier. So at the time I decided it was > better just to put it back in the ground and start from scratch, which > is why I wrote some modified Freenet objects (Presentation, RawMessage > etc) for HTTP to use as the basis for a more "node present" http > interface. > > Because I was not able to give Freenet the time I had wanted between my > trip to SF and the beginning of last week, that effort never really got > off the ground. Thanks to Tavin we have now completed the internal > client hooks though, so using the InternalClient interface it should > very easy to convert programs written for the Client interface in 0.3 to > run internally in the 0.4 node.
I've actually started to have some more time now, so I was planning on coming back into development a bit instead of just writing papers. =) Which are the main classes to look at where you've started to do work on this already? theo _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
