On Sun, May 06, 2001 at 02:34:44AM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:01:40PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > On Sat, May 05, 2001 at 05:29:31PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > > I think it would better to disallow DMI in CHKs altogether. That would > > > make everything must simpler. You can put the DMI for small CHKs in a > > > redirect. > > > > I disagree, this means that a redirect would be required just to insert > > a small image into Freenet if we wanted to associated a MIME-type with > > it. That would (on average) double the time required to retrieve the > > image. Ditto for HTML pages, and anything else too small to split, but > > which uses a MIME-type. > > I agree. The problem is that the metadata formats have been worked out for > flexibility, where as to work for CHKs we need it to be strict as fuck. > What is needed is a strict as fuck subset of the metadata standard for > CHK data to use.
Hm, what about including the MIME type in the CHK URI? /me ducks -- # tavin cole # # "The process of scientific discovery is, in effect, # a continual flight from wonder." # - Albert Einstein _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
