> I know. There was much more to my comment than that. I am suggesting > that FProxy, FCP, and XML-RPC are rewritten to work with that library, > and probably that the command-line clients are rewritten to speak FCP > (some people are doing this already).
This is all already done. FProxy, FCP, XML-RPC, and the command line clients all use Client. Client has been made pluggable so that there are FNP, FCP, and internal access implementations. So porting FProxy, FCP, and XML-RPC merely consists of instantiating the internal access implementation instead of the FNP one, which could be done in 5 minutes if the internal access API was moved up to unstable, which it someday will. Porting the command line clients to use FCP is the same thing, just instantiate the FCP implementation of Client. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
