[freenet-devl] no client metadata in 0.4 CHKs?

[da...@aminal.com]

On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 05:34:04PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 08:45:33AM -0500, david at aminal.com wrote:
> > On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 01:40:13AM -0500, Scott Gregory Miller wrote:
> <>
> > > Thats hardly a reason.  If the metadata points to the CHK of the data
> > > thats an equally strong binding.
> > >
> > 
> > No it's not. It's only an assertion by whomever inserted the metadata. For 
> > the binding
> > to be equally as strong, the data would also have to refer back to the CHK 
> > of the metadata.
> > Then the agreement between inserter of data and inserter of metadata would 
> > be proven.
> 
> Bullshit. I can copy your CHK and insert new metadata linking to that CHK,
> but I can also copy all the data add new metadata and insert the whole
> thing. Why does it matter for two fucking seconds what the inserter of the
> data thought when ANYBODY can reinsert it?
> 
> The ONLY assertion you have is by the person whomever owns the key you