>From david at aminal.com >On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 03:06:44PM -0400, Benjamin Coates wrote: >> Content-Type is how the client decides which viewer to pass the data on to. >> Clients are unlikely to do anything at all with things like "Description" or >> "Publisher" or "Title". This is the sort of thing that would be useful >> *before* you download the CHK, like in an index or something, but putting it >> into the CHK itself means you have to download the whole file to get the >> subject (for example).
>I don't have the ability to decode mpegs, it would be nice to know if something >is an mpeg before fetching the whole bloody file. I suppose a redundant content-type tag in whatever indexing/searching system you are using would be useful, and harmless enough. But I don't see the
