> My simple suggestion for this is that we nail down the FCP, FNP0.4, and > XML-RPC specs, and they become the minimum supported protocols for a > node.
The XML-RPC API seems to have congealed. I'm no longer getting suggestions. I would say that the 1.0 version of the API is done. More parts will be added later for index handling, but those could be written on top of the 1.0 APIs if needed, so I would consider them optional. _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Thu May 17 17:39:57 2001 X-UIDL: 3adbdd6c00000591 X-Mozilla-Status: 0001 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id TAA01414 for <danello at danky.com>; Tue, 15 May 2001 19:10:48 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C451C5800E; Tue, 15 May 2001 16:50:07 -0700 (PDT) Delivered-To: devl at freenetproject.org Received: by hawk.freenetproject.org (Postfix, from userid 500) id 422CB57FFC; Tue, 15 May 2001 16:49:06 -0700 (PDT) To: web at freenetproject.org, devl at freenetproject.org
