You have the wrong guy, I don't speak C++. Much less Adam's code :-).
On Sun, May 20, 2001 at 02:32:49PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Good on you, Oskar! :)) > > No doubt you'll have your hands full, and a long list of tasks awaiting you. > > I'm almost reluctant to suggest this, but... > If there's any way you can fit a little item into your list... > > To analyse the Whiterose code, and contemplate the viability of making it > multi-platform; in particular, able to compile and work fully not just on > Linux, but on Windows (non-cygwin) under MS Visual C++. Not just the > Whiterose code per se, but any and all external libraries on which it > depends. > > Any output on this task, whether just a quick informed opinion, or a > detailed analysis with list of tasks, or even (God forbid) doing the actual > porting and debugging, would be valuable. > > It would be a breakthrough milestone if a Freenet node can be made to > compile and work on native Windows, especially given that more than 90% of > internet-connected PCs use this operating system. > > Cheers > David > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Mr.Bad" <mr.bad at pigdog.org>
