On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 07:15:05PM +0100, Adam Langley wrote: > On Sat, May 26, 2001 at 12:27:55PM -0500, Brandon wrote: > > So rather than caching all the way back the search path, it would be most > > advantagous to cache in an expanding ring around the epicenter. This can > > be done by having a rapidly decaying probability of caching. > > But since our current hope time mu and sigma are 12 seconds a piece > this could make Freenet damm slow.
Come, the values for those doesn't effect the actual speed. Those are just estimations of what the real values are. We'll add something to keep track of the actual mean and variation of (time until reply/htl) in the test versions of the new node, you can do the same, and hopefully we'll find they can reach more sane values. -- 'DeCSS would be fine. Where is it?' 'Here,' Montag touched his head. 'Ah,' Granger smiled and nodded. Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl >From - Tue May 29 05:42:46 2001 X-UIDL: 3adbdd6c00000666 X-Mozilla-Status: 0011 X-Mozilla-Status2: 00000000 Return-Path: <devl-admin at freenetproject.org> Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (postfix@[4.18.42.11]) by funky.danky.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA21692 for <danello at danky.com>; Sat, 26 May 2001 13:52:05 -0400 Received: from hawk.freenetproject.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
