On Tue, May 29, 2001 at 11:25:51AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > content on Freenet - all for a cosmetic improvement. Also, don't forget > the dangers of relying on KSKs, how would a future Rob Malda feel if > someone mounted a KSK attack and gained control of www.slashdot.free? > The best way to prevent this is to encourage people to hand around CHKs > and SSKs.
Well an attack aganst www.slashdot.free is very unlikely to work globally. My KSK-replacement has mostly failed on the popular test.html, only the almost totally unrequested test.jpg worked. However I still go with your view %100; having spoofing possible at all is unacceptible. -- Need some Linux help or custom C(++) programming? Drop me a line and I'll see what I can do. Resume at http://retep.tripod.com/resume.html GCS d s+:-- a--- C++++ UL++++ P L+++ E W++ N- o K- w-- O- M V- PS+ PE+ Y+ PGP+++ t 5 X R+ tv-- b+ DI+ D++ G e- h! r-- y-- pete at petertodd.ca http://www.petertodd.ca -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010529/aa88c160/attachment.pgp>
