On Tue, 29 May 2001, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2001 at 03:15:16PM +1200, David McNab wrote: > > How about I create a separate build of FreeWeb which excludes all the > > fwproxy/DNS/KSK functionality, and publish it under a different name, such > > as 'WinSite', or 'Winsert'.? > > Well, I would prefer that you agree with me and drop the www.xxx.free > functionality altogether. As I mentioned before, where protocols are > concerned, sometimes it is better to deny people options (as when M$ > tries to add Windows specific functionality to Java - they argue that > they are just giving people options, however the more people that take > advantage of those options, the worse it is for the Java platform as a > whole). >
If fwproxy were able to map arbitrary DNS names to freenet keys, someone could define a configuration to totally circumvent a particular site blocking ISP. That may be more useful than a .free domain, although I do it is cool to think of .free as a censorship free domain... it's power is in it's simplicity (but if it exists at all, it should use ssks). _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
