"Dave Hooper" <dave at beermex.com> writes:
> From: "Robert Bihlmeyer" <robbe at orcus.priv.at>
> > Qt Free is only for X ... not MS Windows.
^^^^^^^
> Wrong [...]
> Quote:
> The Qt Non Commercial Edition for Microsoft Windows
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Spot the difference?
Interestingly,
<URL:http://www.trolltech.com/developer/faqs/general.html#Q8> says:
| Qt for Microsoft Windows is only available as Professional and
| Enterprise Editions.
Seems Trolltech are themselves confused.
> Qt would therefore be an ideal development platform for a freenet
> client.
Not IMHO. See below.
> Qt is NOT GPLd though which may cause problems if you are also making use of
> GPLd software.
Qt/X11 is dual licensed under QPL and GNU GPL. But Qt/Windows is
gratis for non-commercial use only. Qt/Mac is (currently) available as
a binary only evaluation verison. I don't know what the licensing plans
are for that platform.
If I write free software, I base it on something that is free
everywhere and for everyone. Just my EUR 0.02.
(It's getting off-topic, that's my last comment on the Qt issue.)
--
Robbe
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.ng
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 232 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011109/a970d9ea/attachment.pgp>
