Ian Clarke wrote: >>Look at Freenet.client.http.NodeStatusServlet >> >>You can set it up to allow remote connections on a per ip basis just like >>fproxy. >> > This is cool. Not to look a gift horse in the mouth, but wouldn't it > have been cleaner to implement this as a FCP command rather than opening > up a new port? FCP was designed for just this kind of task, and we > really shouldn't add a new listen-port for every new piece of > node-client functionality.
Thanks Gianni for developing Freenet further, but thanks Ian for speaking right out of my heart. It makes me a bit nervous to introduce yet another servlet for this and that task, opening a new port for each of them. I'd rather see a clean FCP implementation with some focus on security instead of this approach. Nevertheless am I appreciating a lot what Gianni does for Freenet... Sebastian _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
