William_dw -- Sqlcoders (Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 08:57:33PM -0800): > > >> On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:21:22PM +0000, Timm Murray wrote: > >> > This is getting really bloody annoying. Is there any way we can ban > any post that isn't 100% > >> > text/text. > >> > >> So that we don't have to read anything that Ian, Adam, or Scott posts? > > > >Oh thats right, crypto programs use a diffrent mime header, don't they? > > Just from looking through my inbox, > One of the various 2 part emails that's sent by Ian etc(one part is the > text, the other is a .dat which i assume contains the key), shows as: > Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; > protocol="application/pgp-signature". > > So surely mailman or whatever its called can take a comma'd list of these, > ie: text/text,multipart/signed,etc..
which doesn't help, of course, since multipart/signed doesn't say anything about the content of each of these parts. it would be valid to put this multipart/signed thing around the whole multipart/mixed package this worm is in. oh, well, i know, freenetters never get worms. excluding non-members helps a lot -- if you want to anoy people useing multiple accounts. my 0.02ECU -- moritz i never let my schooling get in the way of my education -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20011129/87827d72/attachment.pgp>
