On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 08:11:26AM +0100, Volker Stolz wrote:
> In local.freenet, you wrote:
> > Two things: 1) the best solution would be just to modify the routing table
> > so that it never stores references to these nodes in the first place,
>
> I decided against that because I can still give out these refs to other nodes.
No, your node never gives out any node ref but its own.
Instead of changing the routing table it might be best to adjust
Freenet.node.states.request.AwaitingStoreData, where it makes the
reference() call on the routing table.. we talked about putting some
logic there to test the ref about to be added for whether this node
could actually contact it, and if not instead add the ref of the
immediately upstream node.
> > and 2) the number of nodes running on those ports is going to be
> > virtually zero so there is just no point in doing it, you might as well
> > not run a permanent node.
>
> It?s going to be at least two next week. And I indeed expect to see an
> increasing number of nodes doing this.
They will probably never comprise a significant percentage of the
network.. but who knows..
--
:: tavin cole (tcole at espnow.com) ::
if there's been a way to build it
there'll be a way to destroy it
things are not all that out of control
- stereolab
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
