On Wed, Oct 10, 2001 at 03:21:57PM +0200, Adam Wern wrote: > Two questions > > 1. Does redundancy make streaming content from freenet impossible? > (I mean without having the whole file in store) Or has it never > been possible?
It doesn't have to, I guess it depends on the scheme used. If anything, redundant splitting is the only way to get streamable speeds from data in Freenet. > 2. Will our redundancy recreate the all missing parts and put them > in store, or will it just keep the downloaded minimum set in the > store. Example: 10 of 11 parts is sufficient to recreate a file. > Assuming we download ten parts, should we then create the 11:th > part and put it in store? There are no plans to involve FNP in any way, meaning that it will only relate to clients, nodes just see data as data. Clients reinserting parts they could not receive has been discussed, and could be a good idea, but needs to be done with care (so that data cannot be created purposely so as to incite others to flood the network). > / Adam Wern > > wire > > Adam Wern - wern at kth.se > "You can do anything, but not everything" > > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl -- Though here at journey's end I lie In darkness buried deep, above all shadows rides the Sun beyond all towers strong and high, and the Stars forever dwell: beyond all mountains steep, I will not say the Day is done, nor bid the Stars farewell. (JRRT) Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
