devl at freenetproject.org schrieb am 16.10.01: > I think there's no objection about merging these 2 programs. But, just a > question, do you really need to use MFC because I can't compile it with gcc > :( (or maybe I'm stupid).
I had the same objections before, but NodeConfig uses the MFC quite heavily, if you convert it to a "normal WinAPI" app, feel free, I can't. But they might still be compiled as to seperate projects (one MFC one not) and just linked together as one binary. I have to admitt that I don't really know if that is feasable on Windows or how to do it. > I noticed that you used a localized dll for the german version. Maybe it > should be better if all translations are included in the .rc file since > windows autodetects the language. Does it use the language specific ressources during compile time, or during run time? If it's the former that wouldn't be sufficient (we would need to provide a full compiled binary for every language) if it's the latter it might be nice to stick at least the main languages in there. I like the dynamic dll thing, because you can simply plug any language in there at any time. Sebastian _______________________________________________________________________ 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de IhrName at web.de, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
