Oskar Sandberg wrote: > I would like to note here that it is NOT a good idea to announce > yourself to a lot of different peers. Ideally it should be just one, > though two or three is probably a good idea for redundancy. More is > directly harmful.
In this case Freenet does not the right thing. I guess it's the default setting announcementPeers=10 which should be lowered then, right? (/me is not sure what the setting is precisely for) >>b) in case of a failed-announcement >>(which was the case in 99% during the last days) you will get the same >>stuff all over after 5 sec, 10 sec, ..., 3600 sec. (don't quote me on >>the intervals though). Which can make it quite a lot of entries. > > So we'll go with the time honored Freenet tradition of fixing the > symptom (or in this case the WARNING) rather than fixing the problem... I do not feel it's fixing the symptoms in this case as the error messages of failure will still be part of the log. I do think that announcement *scheduling* is a rather minor event (despite of actually performing the announcement which should be part of the "normal" log). Sebastian _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
