Patrick Oscar Boykin wrote: > If a few key people get really uninterested or very unavailible, this > project could collapse. At the same time, people often talk about > freenet as if it is the most important software project on the internet, > and all other P2P or data haven projects are clueless when compared to > freenet.
> I think the documentation of the node and control protocols should be > very high priority, or I think freenet is going to continue to have > trouble atracting interest from developers. Oscar, I agree with you that protocol specs, and other docu is the most important thing to have in that project. Reading Ian's thesis gives you some ideas but it doesn't really tell you something about Freds architecture. But on the other hand there is the Freenet Wiki where people can start doing the documentation themselves and in fact nobody has done so yet. You might just want to start on doing something and bother Oskar,Ian,Scott on the specific topics. They are willing to reveal their tacit and secret knowledge after all. You can't really blame *them* for not liking to document stuff. We simply have no documentation guys on the project so far... Sebastian _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
