On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 09:35:21PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote: > On Sun, Sep 02, 2001 at 08:33:37AM -0700, Scott G. Miller wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 04:15:24PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > > Just browsing hawk's 0.4 node log, I notice a significant number of > > > "Rejected connection: Thread limit reached" messages. This lasts for a > > > while and then it starts working again (persumably because the CT count > > > of hawk's node has dropped and the number of incoming connections has > > > dropped too). The problem is that when the nodes connection handler is > > > full, local attempts to request files are failing too. > > > > > > I know there was some talk of reserving some threads for local requests > > > - perhaps we need to consider this. > > > > I've changed the code to always allow new threads from local > > connections. Let me know if this helps. > > That's patching the syndrome, not the problem. Chances are that even if > your requests get through locally, you won't see a reply. Why not? Do we expect another limit to be hit elsewhere?
-------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010902/8ba43c3a/attachment.pgp>
