> * Get out the first real 0.4 release. Well, I guess 0.4.3 fits this bill, although personally I have had limited success with it as documented by some of my recent posts to this list. Moved to "Completed".
> * Produce more thorough and accurate newbie instructions for > getting up and running with 0.4. Indeed, the current website docs on checking it out of CVS have yet to be updated to account for the new javax.servlet requirement. > * Produce RFC quality specs for client metadata, FCP, and FNP. Come on people, Latex is pre-installed on your Linux distro for a reason! > * Write unit tests for various components of Fred (routing table, > data store, ADTs, the message handler, key encoding and decoding > algorithms, and so forth). We have unit tests for some of these, and good 'ol hawk even runs them daily. > * Come up with a smoke test suite for a newly compiled node. I believe David McNab looked at this, but I don't know how far he got. > * Produce a gcj-based binary distro of Fred. MJR? Last thing I heard the ball was in GCJ's court (in fact, this is where it seems to spend most of its time on this issue). > * Produce a Kaffe-bundled distro of Fred. Not sure about this one, word on the street is that Freenet doesn't work that well with Kaffe. Ian. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010903/39549719/attachment.pgp>
