Would that even be possible? Freenet basicly can't work at all without CHKs, and CHK uses cryptographic hashes. Perhaps hashes wouldn't count?
> Or we take a hint from Linux and separate the crypto from the main > distribution and let those that can provide encryption do so. > > On Wed, Sep 26, 2001 at 11:10:00PM -0500, thelema wrote: > > On Wed, 26 Sep 2001, Jamie Morken wrote: > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > How is freenet going to work when encryption is outlawed worldwide? I am > > > in > > > Canada and they may be passing laws soon to outlaw true encryption for > > > civilian use. This may be the case in European countries and in the USA > > > as > > > well! I think it will be hard even for Oscar to make a robust freenet > > > without encryption! > > > > > > best regards, > > > Jamie > > > > > Chafing and Winnowing comes to mind. steganography without encryption. > > > > Thelema > > -- > > E-mail: thelema314 at bigfoot.com If you love something, set it free. > > GPG 1536g/B9C5D1F7 fpr:075A A3F7 F70B 1397 345D A67E 70AA 820B A806 F95D > > > > -- > melt grits gerry cool ----------------------------------------------- Runbox Mail Manager - www.runbox.com Online email application _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
