While I am reluctant to be critical, since we do need a new gateway page, I think that users find a website with light lettering and a black background, somewhat busy, which can be confusing and clostrophobic. I think that dark lettering on a white background, with minimal complexity is preferable.
Ian. On Fri, Sep 28, 2001 at 01:28:34AM +1200, David McNab wrote: > Hi, > > I've finally got around to re-designing the gateway.html page for fcpproxy on > 0.4 > You'll love it or hate it. > > It's in FreeWeb CVS, as freeweb-src/fcpproxy/gateway.html. > Also on the web at: > http://freeweb.sf.net/bin/windows/gateway.html > Note - the pic at top right will 404 unless you save the file to > ~/gateway.html (linux) or freenet program folder (windows) and view it > through fcpproxy. > > Please - don't criticise it unless you attach what you feel to be a better > design. > But I do hope (most of) you all like it. > > Cheers > David > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20010927/bda1c58e/attachment.pgp>
