On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 01:13:16PM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > > It's not fully distributed, yet (there's still a single IRCd), but v2 > > looks like it will be incredibly awesome (can't get anything too solid > > on a timescale, but I think it's supposed to be soon). > > I am still pretty sceptical about its security, I have been pestering > its authors for some time now to have their architecture peer-reviewed > by someone who is an expert in anonymity/crypto, and to my knowledge > this hasn't happened. I would be reluctant to endorse IIP until it > has undergone some peer-review.
What is the worry? Are we concerned that IIP might actually not be secure and that we would lure people onto the channel with a false sense of security? At the moment, OPN is not anonymous in any way really, so even if IIP was insecure, nothing would really change - we'd be going from a non-anonymous IRC server to another non-anonymous IRC server. -- David Allen http://opop.nols.com/ _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
