Oskar, I am sorry if anything in my previous set of emails had given you the impression that I was kidding, joking around or otherwise attempting to pull a practical joke over on the mailing list. Or perhaps when you said "serious" what you really meant was "real" in which case you are insulting me and that is definitely not appreciated.
Your suggestion that I should move my discussion to the tech mailing list is fascinating. I'm sure you are aware, as I am, that nothing is discussed on that list. In fact, any time someone raises a point on that list that is worth discussing, it just sits there until someone decides to forward it to devl at . Perhaps you meant that my idea is not worth discussing... again I take offense. You, personally, know nothing about me. How you managed to make your decision regarding the worthiness of my programming ability and ability to discuss development issues is beyond me and it is uninformed, at best. To directly reply to your request that I move my discussion to the tech list, the answer is no. However, I would be willing to move it at the request of more developers. However, since you don't feel I am a real developer, I give you this opportunity to demonstrate, publicly, where my inadequacy as a developer lies. What exactly is the problem with my concept? Where is the fatal flaw that makes it such a waste of time? If my problem exists due to misunderstandings about the way that fred and freenet operates, perhaps you could take the time to explain to me how I am wrong. After all, no one here bothers to keep the documentation up to date so how is anyone expected to learn how fred operates with out asking questions? If you are of the opinion that no one outside of the current set of developers could possibly be of benefit to the project, you are sadly mistaken and such an elitist view will only hamper the project, not help it. Personally, I don't think you even read the email that you replied to. I'm of the opinion that you just decided it was not worth your time and you have no objective information to support your view. I await your objective analysis of the flaws in my idea and myself. Thank you for your time, -- FLOG On 10-Dec-2002 17:45:26 -0500, you wrote: > Could you divert this to the tech list, please. It is intended for this > sort of discussions, so that they don't need to bother the serious > developers. > > Thank you. > > > On Tue, Dec 10, 2002 at 03:54:13PM -0500, The FLOG Index wrote: > > I am glad to see some replies to my intial post =) This email tries to > > cover what has been said and what I think that translates into regarding > > the SneakerNet transport method. > <blablablablabla> > > -- > Oskar Sandberg > oskar at freenetproject.org > > _______________________________________________ > devl mailing list > devl at freenetproject.org > http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl >
