Ian Clarke <ian at freenetproject.org> writes:

> Wouldn't it be preferable to have a generic "GetNodeStatus" command which 
> contained more general information, including EstimatedLoad?
> 
> Ian.
> 

Probably, but that doesn't mean we shouldn't start with a command that
just gets the load.  I guess you're arguing that this particular
naming scheme will have to be changed to fit the more generic
implementation, but we might as well test this simple command to see
the usefulness/repurcussions of it before going all the way.  If we
have to break compatibility, so be it.  we're still way before 1.0,
and this is a minor command.

Thelema
-- 
E-mail: thelema314 at swbell.net                         Raabu and Piisu
GPG 1024D/36352AAB fpr:756D F615 B4F3 BFFC 02C7  84B7 D8D7 6ECE 3635 2AAB

_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to