On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:17:34PM +0200, Tuomas Lukinmaa wrote: > On Tue, 19 Feb 2002, Oskar Sandberg wrote: <> > > I fixed most of these I think, except the DOCTYPE thing which must be > > one of those annoying newfangled things that postdate my html knowledge > > (circa 93 or so). > > Well, HTML 2.0 has it's DOCTYPE specified and it's dated as 1994, so it's > somewhat old.
2.0! Kids these days... > Out of curiosity, I checked the cvs check-in and noticed a mistake in it. > Maybe it was partly my fault not saying what to fix exactly and writing > bit too optimistic commentary. You should also include TITLE tag for every > page. It's mandatory, though HTML, HEAD and BODY are not. If you like, you > can retain your old-style coding of HTML, just make sure TITLE is used. > Some old browsers might not parse server returned Content-Type, thus > searching HTML or TITLE to determine if the page is text or HTML. IIRC, > even latest IE versions did this in some cases when loading HTML content > from file. Can't remember the details though. Urg, I'm not planning to bother with this, I have better things to do. It renders fine in mozilla which is good enough for me. Like I said, if you want to write the HTML just make a demo page and I'll put it in. -- Oskar Sandberg oskar at freenetproject.org _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
