--* Oskar Sandberg (Wed, Feb 27, 2002 at 12:35:41AM +0100) *--
> I would be the first to admit that Freenet does not offer real
> anonymity. I have never claimed it does. But trying to use a mixnet as a
> transport would not be the right way to try to make Freenet anonymous -
> you are much better off using the existing nodes to do a number of onion
> routed steps before you start Key routing. The amount of traffic that is
> currently being seen between Freenet nodes ought to be a wet dream for
> anybody wishing to hide anonymous transactions.
At which layer would the onion prerouted steps be coded in your view? As
opposed to the solution I proposed.
Thanks for the help,
--nico
--
nico galoppo - tremelo/leuven, belgium
- baalsebaan 163, 3120 tremelo
---------------------------------------------------------------
[bash]:~$ man woman nico at crossbar dot net
No manual entry for woman debian linux :: vim powered
_______________________________________________
Devl mailing list
Devl at freenetproject.org
http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
