On Tue, Jan 22, 2002 at 04:03:58PM -0500, Tavin Cole wrote: > > Surely the servlet itself has an idea what its context and URI should > > be? > > No, a servlet compliant with the Java Servlets 2.2 standard has no idea > what context or URI it belongs under. They are designed to be run under > arbitrary combinations of these.
I am not sure I see the point in limiting ourselves to this standard when a servlet like nodestatus will never work outside of Freenet anyway. > > > Someone installing fred and a public fproxy, or one on a multiuser > > > system, will most definitely not want those console servlets running on > > > that port. > > > > I don't think this is the issue. > > It is a reason not to cram them onto the same port with fproxy. Of > course ultimately the node operator can mix and match them however she > pleases. Er, my point exactly. Whether the two servlets are on the same port or not has no bearing on this issue. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian at freenetproject.org Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020122/cd133225/attachment.pgp>
