On May 1, 2002 09:36 am, Edgar Friendly wrote: > ian at hawk.freenetproject.org (Ian Clarke) writes: > > My understanding is that at the moment QueryRejected messages do not > > result in a reduction in CP - the question is whether they should, it > > seems to me that the alternative is that busy nodes get busier until > > they stop accepting connections completely. > > > > Ian. > > I've been thinking about this since you posted it. My initial > reaction was "hell no", but as I think more about how overloaded nodes > are getting, I have to wonder if this might be necessary, to have > longer timeouts than one minute when a node is overloaded for a long > time. The reduction in traffic would also be good for really > overloaded nodes, as my node is so overloaded it's having to refuse > connections, it can't cope with the its percieved load. > > I say "percieved load" because I wonder if there's some bug in the > load counting. I had my computer unplugged from the internet for > several hours and when I came back to it, my freenet node was still > reporting about 2/5 of its capacity taken up. Now there's no reason > for requests to stay around for that long if they can't go anywhere, > so I have to wonder if there's some leak in threads or something > that's decreasing nodes' capacity after a while. I can't debug this > myself, but will gladly supply any information I can.
I wonder if this is just the overhead needed to support the various servlets and other core freenet code? Java likes threads and freenet really uses them. Ed Tomlinson _______________________________________________ Devl mailing list Devl at freenetproject.org http://lists.freenetproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devl
