At 19.00 31/10/02 -0500, you wrote: >Matthew Toseland (toad at amphibian.dyndns.org) wrote: >> On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 12:17:42AM +0100, Anonymous wrote: >> > I think we need an auto-string-matching-filter with 'localhost' and >> > startwith '127.' addresses wich ignore that references. >> What about 192.168. etc? We can block the same IPs that we already check >> to bypass the bandwidth limiter. > >I can envision someone trying to set up a private Freenet for testing. >If you block non-routable or loopback addresses by default (which >I agree is a good idea), then there should be a config file setting >for people to *not* block, so they can set up their private Freenets.
IMHO, this too is a good point (I do a private Freenet long ago ...) What about block silly addresses always & put in freenet.conf a parameter to allow/disallow private addresses (guess the default value ....) ? Ciao. Marco -- + il Progetto Freenet - segui il coniglio bianco + * the Freenet Project - follow the white rabbit * * Marco A. Calamari marcoc at dada.it www.marcoc.it * * PGP RSA: ED84 3839 6C4D 3FFE 389F 209E 3128 5698 * + DSS/DH: 8F3E 5BAE 906F B416 9242 1C10 8661 24A9 BFCE 822B + _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
