On Tue, Nov 19, 2002 at 04:21:18PM +0000, Matthew Toseland wrote: > easier for some users, but unless we provide a link to the source _for > that particular compile_ somewhere in the code, it's a probable GPL > violation (Joe gets from fp.org, a release, so could get the source. > Mary gets from Joe, Adam gets from Mary... Adam has no easy way to > find the source, and if Mary or Joe disappears, is stuffed).
We simply include a link to http://freenetproject.org/ somewhere in the distribution (possibly in the COPYING file) saying that the source can be obtained there. I don't believe that the GPL demands that the source be available anonymously just because the binary is. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian@[freenetproject.org|locut.us|cematics.com] Latest Project http://cematics.com/kanzi Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20021119/dd602ebd/attachment.pgp>
