In message <20021017131541.GA29434 at freenetproject.org>, Ian Clarke 
<ian at freenetproject.org> writes
>On Wed, Oct 16, 2002 at 07:51:45PM -0400, Greg Wooledge wrote:
>> My seeds are at http://wooledge.org/~greg/seednodes.ref as usual,
>> should you wish to pursue your problem from that direction.
>
>Are people finding that the seed nodes provided by hawk are ineffective?
>
>Ian.
>
I'm still finding DNS problems, last time I looked, hawk's  old hn.org 
DNS server still thought it was authoritative , and the TTL on the new 
one was only 1 hour, which means I keep getting the old IP address 
cached for a day or two. However, I have always found that the seed 
nodes provided by hawk gave a node enough of a hint to get going after 6 
to 12 hours.  The original poster was worried that the seed nodes 
included a lot using old builds, but then we know that is a feature of 
Freenet.  It might have worked better if he  left the node running 
longer.  Perhaps new users should be encouraged to delete seednodes.ref 
if they use the update script when they have a good working node, 
because I have always found (perhaps contrary to design behaviour) that 
nodes lose routing when restarted with a fresh set of seed nodes less 
"good"  than the ones already in the routing table.
-- 
Roger Hayter

_______________________________________________
devl mailing list
devl at freenetproject.org
http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl

Reply via email to