On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:00:59PM -0400, Gianni Johansson wrote:
> On Monday 02 September 2002 15:10, you wrote:
>
> > > On Mon, Sep 02, 2002 at 07:28:32PM +0200, Oskar Sandberg wrote:
> > > The fact remains that any link from outside freenet can already do this.
> > > If it is really a problem then we ought to get rid of the htl argument in
> > > the URL altogether, and make it configuration setting.
> >
> > Another solution would be to have fproxy generate a random per-session
> > key which must be specified whenever a "protected" argument (such as
> > HTL) is used.
> Sounds fine to me.
>
> I can't think of any arguments that wouldn't fall into the class of
> protected though.
You mean apart from ?date, ?mime, ?key ?
>
> --gj
>
> _______________________________________________
> devl mailing list
> devl at freenetproject.org
> http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL:
<https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020902/751f3e3b/attachment.pgp>
