On Wed, Sep 04, 2002 at 06:52:40PM -0700, Ian Clarke spake thusly: > It his high-time we took concerted action to kill the datastore bug.
Glory glory hallelujah! Next time my datastore tosses its cookies what should I do? What information do you need? I'd like to help however possible. > - Someone figures out how Tavin's datastore works and debugs it Not a bad idea. Did Tavin get hit by a bus or something? > - We reimplement it If someone else is working on a native datastore then I would suggest letting them do their thing while we figure out what's wrong with the current datastore. The question should be this: Is Tavin's design good and worth salvaging or is it poorly designed and bound to be full of problems forever? > Failing that, we could implement a single-file datastore, but attempt > to avoid the complexity of the current implementation. Isn't a single file datastore quite hard to debug? I'm always a fan of not reinventing the wheel so it would seem wise to let native filesystems do as much as possible. -- Tracy Reed http://www.ultraviolet.org -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 240 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020904/288c1b95/attachment.pgp>
