fish writes: > > My bad, that's what I get for testing on small files ^_^. (when your > files are only 1meg, you don't hit hex, and hence, you know, it's all good > then :-p.). sorry! > > Anyhow, looking at GJ's patch, I understand what I did that was > incompatable now, so should I fix it to be compatable with the old fproxy > format (from what I can see, there are significantly more files out there > in fproxy-old format than fishfec/fproxy-new format...), or, given that > fproxy has now been patched, avoid breaking compatability yet again?
Please consider the FEC-fish files 'broken' and fix. Having people FEC-uploading with fproxy build 495 having their files Just Not Work is a bad thing. Eventually, if we need to make radical changes to the block-pattern of FEC a FECv2 can be implemented. A gratuitous change like this is just bad. Revert fproxy, fix fyshtools, everything is happy. --Dan _______________________________________________ devl mailing list devl at freenetproject.org http://hawk.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
