On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:58:13AM -0700, scgmille at freenetproject.org wrote: > > This is good, but we really can't up the build number that frequently > > for our users - it will really piss them off. > > > > As a guideline - we should try not to increment the build number more > > than once a week. > > Uh, no. Its a *build* number, ie it should be updated every time we > build a new version of Freenet. Whether it affects an auto-upgrade or > prevents other nodes from contacting it is the policy decision that > should be made.
Ok ok - perhaps the answer is to make the new-build warning less obtrusive. Ian. -- Ian Clarke ian at freenetproject.org Founder & Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ Chief Technology Officer, Uprizer Inc. http://www.uprizer.com/ Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 232 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/1968386d/attachment.pgp>
