Gianni Johansson <giannijohansson at attbi.com> writes: > On Tuesday 03 September 2002 17:11, you wrote: > > The FEC code in freenet-ext.jar is not GPL compatible. > > I hadn't turned it on by default yet because the fproxy UI code still has > some bugs in it. Maybe it's time to turn it on bugs and all. > > As far as licensing goes IANAL
Me neither (as if you couldn't guess that). > Justin's FEC stuff is under a modified BSD license. > > I've seen some people say you can't mix BSD and GPL code and others say you > can't. If you have definitive links, please post them. Actually, the license is not my concern here (AFAICS BSD-without-advertising is used, which is GPL-compatible). That some parts[1] of freenet-ext.jar don't come with source is the problem here. Binaries without complete source are not free software (or open source software), regardless of their license. -- Robbe -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.ng Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20020906/14981036/attachment.pgp>
