On Mon, Mar 10, 2003 at 05:14:44PM -0800, Ian Clarke wrote: > When a request fails, I get a message: > > "You could try retrieving an earlier dated version (better but > date-specific link)." > > Now, I have no idea what a "better but date-specific link" is, so you > can bet that 99.9% of our users won't either - so why bother confusing > them?
Because it is extremely useful to the 0.01% who do to be able to get a bookmark for the site on a given date with all the links and images work? It could be phrased better, do you have any ideas on that? > > Ian. > > -- > Ian Clarke ian at locut.us > Coordinator, The Freenet Project http://freenetproject.org/ > CEO, Cematics LLC http://cematics.com/ > Founder, Locutus http://locut.us/ > Personal Homepage http://locut.us/ian/ -- Matthew Toseland toad at amphibian.dyndns.org/amphibian at users.sourceforge.net Full time freenet hacker. http://freenetproject.org/ Freenet Distribution Node (temporary) at http://80-192-4-36.cable.ubr09.na.blueyonder.co.uk:8889/NZtBAIGOWnU/ ICTHUS. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: not available URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20030311/5044a9c8/attachment.pgp>
