Matthew Toseland wrote: > Should we: > a) Adapt the method from FIPS 186-2 for generating groups, and create a > new group with 1536 or 2048 bits p, and 256 bits q? (Can the specified > method produce weak/dangerous groups?) > b) Stick with 160-bit hashes and small keys for now? (We may be stuck > with it until 1.0 if so...) > c) Do something else?
'a' sounds definitely better for me (IMHO) but I don't know anything about possible weakness. Cheers, Emanuele
