Thanks for this info - could you file a bug for it - attaching this image? http://bugs.freenetproject.org/
Ian. On 8 Apr 2006, at 16:52, Thomas Bruderer wrote: > Hi devl > > was surprised how good 0.7 alpha is, wasn't that enthuastic before > I testet it. > > I also tried fuqid today. > > My test enviroment: have a server well connected to the darknet, > have some big neigbors, and have several connections. Downloads are > fine and quite fast. I am connected from my client machine with > only one connection to my server. So there are no big influences > from others, even if some requests come in. > > I now tested an insert into freenet 0.7 and its horrible, well > horrible is an understatement. I have 2KB upstream in average. > Priority Maximum. > > I attached the Bandwithgraph, as you see there are peeks the peaks > are limited by my bandwith (30KB out) and happen to be around 15 - > 17 seconds apart. so this are the real inserts. they take here > around 1 second, then there is almost NO traffic at all, as you can > see. I dont know if fn05 have the same upload problem, but here it > is obvious that it just doesnt use the given bandwith. This makes > the inserts for me 15x times slower than it should be, thats not good. > > FN 0.7 says: Inserts 4. (maybe you try too few inserts the same time?) > > BTW: I tried more than one insert the same time, nothing changed, I > tried to lower the priority, it got worse which is ok since thats > what the priority should be like... > > I am not the only one mention this peaks, there was already a > discussion on IRC and a similar pic to mine is inserted into > darknet... Its still alpha, so plenty of time to change it, but it > should be really adressed, since the inserters are probably > important users :) > > cu > > > <graph.png> > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl
