I am not convinced that the darknet is idle. Is there any way to test this?
On Wed, Apr 19, 2006 at 07:40:05AM +0000, Thomas Bruderer wrote: > > emphasis "using more bandwith of the overall network". The network is of > > course starved for bandwidth most of the time, due to asynhronous > > connections. > > Do we agree that most darknet nodes idle? > Or do we atleast agree that most testnet nodes idle? > > The testenviroment right now is quite perfect, the inserts should be fast > right > now. What I am saying is that if downloads are fast, inserts have to be as > fast, > because we don't use more bandwith per link. The asynchronous connections are > problem for all p2p protocols, they are not only a problem with uploads, they > limit the downloads aswell. > > For inserts the speed limit is the per link bandwith (well for downloads > aswell) > but I get told all the time it has something to do with number of hops, which > can't be true. > > We should check different strategies in testnet till inserts are fast at least > in testnet... -- Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 189 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/devl/attachments/20060421/33101f9e/attachment.pgp>
