Uh, I'm not sure and I've never tested it, but isn't Freenet usually and
otherwise IPv6 capable?
>Author: nextgens
>Date: 2006-08-16 13:48:59 +0000 (Wed, 16 Aug 2006)
>New Revision: 10118
>
>Modified:
> trunk/freenet/src/freenet/transport/IPUtil.java
>Log:
>we should reject ipv6 addresses even in 'public static boolean checkAddre=
>ss(byte[] b)'
>
>Modified: trunk/freenet/src/freenet/transport/IPUtil.java
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=
>=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
>--- trunk/freenet/src/freenet/transport/IPUtil.java 2006-08-16 13:44:57 U=
>TC (rev 10117)
>+++ trunk/freenet/src/freenet/transport/IPUtil.java 2006-08-16 13:48:59 U=
>TC (rev 10118)
>@@ -68,6 +68,9 @@
> }
>=20
> public static boolean checkAddress(byte[] b) {
>+ if(b.length !=3D 4) {
>+ return false;
>+ }
> int[] i =3D new int[4];
> for(int x=3D0;x<4;x++) i[x] =3D b[x] & 0xff;
> return checkAddress(i);
>
>_______________________________________________
>cvs mailing list
>cvs at freenetproject.org
>http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cvs
